Decided - sugar will be banned
What began over 70 years ago is now coming to a well-deserved conclusion. The recent state elections have shown that the common people are incapable of drawing any conclusions. Clear the way for the final coup of the sugar ban.
When the planning for keeping the population healthy began, it was still envisaged that the additional product of sweet grasses such as sugar cane as well as the domestic beet could be banned from foodstuffs by means of levying taxes and steadily increasing them.
But this has already not worked for tobacco and mineral oil. This is why paraffin is not taxed, unlike biological fuels, which are also used in cosmetic products and thus contribute to health. Where would we end up if airlines avoided German airports or Formula 1 no longer held a German Grand Prix because it was too expensive in Germany?
Apart from the automobile and tobacco lobbies, the members of parliament don't let anyone finance their million-dollar mansions, as they have promised with imploring signatures. But back to sugar:
The calorific value of carbohydrates is not that high in relation to alcohol or fat. In the 1800s, this was the reason for industrialising production. Today we know that sugar is more harmful than alcohol. And that is a good thing. Because without drunken politicians, who care about nothing more than the health of the electorate, it would not have come about in this long and difficult process that the immediate sugar ban was decided across all parties.
You have to absolutely admire the people, mainly lawyers with no knowledge of nutrition, biology, social competence or just plain common sense, how they have managed to manipulate the population in this last phase of their plan since last year in such a sophisticated way and make them indifferent to any measure or regulation, no matter how moronic it may seem, that it does not even take any law to convince the equally well-meaning industry to give up and ban sugar.
Where to now with all the sugar, the plantations and the unpaid labour?
A positive side effect is, of course, that in future cannabis, erythroxylon coca (coca bush) and, of course, opium poppies will be grown in the tropical fields instead of sugar cane. And the natural sweetener already produced and imported, like the millions of tonnes of plastic packaging waste that cannot be burnt in heavy industry, will be exported as development aid back to the countries of production, where it will rot on the dumps in the middle of the cleared rainforests as fertiliser for opium production. The cycle of sugar death is already a wonderful thing.
So eat lots of sugar while you can, and don't read the package leaflet (called 'ingredients' for food-like products) if it says, for example, glucose-fructose (syrup), saccharin or saccarose, HFCS (high fructose corn syrup), sorghum syrup, sucanat, maltrodextrin or maltose; because reading small print puts your eye health at risk.